<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Tiago Moreira</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tiago.kamots.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tiago.kamots.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:30:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on OpenOffice.org Goes Silent without Java by Tiago Moreira</title>
		<link>http://tiago.kamots.net/2009/02/16/ooo-goes-silent-without-java/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiago Moreira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tiago.kamots.net/?p=8#comment-4</guid>
		<description>I was just pointing out what I was observing. As far as I know, the detection issue was a problem with Java&#039;s installation routines. I haven&#039;t been able to replicate this issue recently so I don&#039;t think it&#039;s an issue any more.

However, I still think OpenOffice.org needs to have better detection of Java. To be honest though, I tend to install the version without the bundled Java version. I&#039;m sure that this is not really an issue for the majority of users; the default download is usually the bundled version anyways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just pointing out what I was observing. As far as I know, the detection issue was a problem with Java&#8217;s installation routines. I haven&#8217;t been able to replicate this issue recently so I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s an issue any more.</p>
<p>However, I still think OpenOffice.org needs to have better detection of Java. To be honest though, I tend to install the version without the bundled Java version. I&#8217;m sure that this is not really an issue for the majority of users; the default download is usually the bundled version anyways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OpenOffice.org Goes Silent without Java by have a real solution</title>
		<link>http://tiago.kamots.net/2009/02/16/ooo-goes-silent-without-java/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>have a real solution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 05:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tiago.kamots.net/?p=8#comment-3</guid>
		<description>So... do you have a real solution to the Ooo j jre64 problem or you you just winning?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230; do you have a real solution to the Ooo j jre64 problem or you you just winning?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OpenOffice.org Goes Silent without Java by Tiago Moreira</title>
		<link>http://tiago.kamots.net/2009/02/16/ooo-goes-silent-without-java/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiago Moreira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 03:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tiago.kamots.net/?p=8#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t experienced this issue since the newer Java update, so it may have been something with my JRE install. Either way, this should not happen again if you keep current with your software updates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t experienced this issue since the newer Java update, so it may have been something with my JRE install. Either way, this should not happen again if you keep current with your software updates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
